---
product_id: 52434204
title: "Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage"
price: "389 Lei"
currency: RON
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 12
url: https://www.desertcart.ro/products/52434204-fowlers-dictionary-of-modern-english-usage
store_origin: RO
region: Romania
---

# Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage

**Price:** 389 Lei
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage
- **How much does it cost?** 389 Lei with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.ro](https://www.desertcart.ro/products/52434204-fowlers-dictionary-of-modern-english-usage)

## Best For

- Customers looking for quality international products

## Why This Product

- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Buy Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage 4 by Butterfield, Jeremy (ISBN: 9780199661350) from desertcart's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.

Review: A useful - and also very enjoyable - reference book - This newest version of “Fowler”, by Jeremy Butterfield, is a great book. It’s really enjoyable to dip into, as well as being a useful reference work. You can intend to just look one thing up, and end up spending half an hour browsing through various entries. In his introduction, Butterfield admits that in this book he is being both descriptive and prescriptive. That is, he is both describing how English IS used today, and also making comments on how he thinks it SHOULD be used. Today the experts generally talk about “standard” English rather than “correct” English. But sometimes Butterfield rightly points out that certain things are clearly wrong. For example, we should definitely write “It’s raining”, and not “Its raining”. However, it is often the case that what is classed as “standard” changes over time, leading to a situation where there might be two ways of writing something, with opinion divided over which is “correct”. So, for example, “media” is the plural of medium, and it would therefore strictly speaking be correct to say “The mass media are...” rather than “The mass media is...” But Butterfield shows that it is becoming increasingly acceptable to say and write the latter, with “media” being used as a collective noun with singular agreement. Another example of change is the fact that far more people now write “A historical...” than “An historical...” The former has become “standard”. The up-to-date nature of the book is also shown by the fact that we have discussions on the use of “website” versus “web site”, and “online” versus “on line” versus “on-line”. I also like the way that the author shoots down myths such as these three: (1) That you should never end a sentence with a preposition. (2) That you should never start a sentence with “And”. (3) That you should never split an infinitive. I really like this book, but that doesn’t mean I always agree with Butterfield. For example, he recommends “coordinate” and “cooperate” rather than “co-ordinate” and “co-operate”. But given that he acknowledges that we should write “co-opt” and “co-op”, it seems more logical to me to stick to “co-ordinate” and “co-operate”. But disagreements like this make the whole subject more interesting. Phil Webster.
Review: A great new edition: modern and up to date, yet still our trusty classic - This is the first new edition in 19 years, and it's excellent. Bigger than ever, and full of entries for some very modern up-to-date words, some common (podcast) and others not so common (wilfing, anyone?) The new editor appears to have done an exhaustive (and exhausting) overhaul of the book, while keeping its spirit alive. The introduction, where the editor explains how the modern Oxford English Corpus - a database of texts - has helped him to compile the book, is also very interesting. The advice ranges from the practical and mundane to the more opinionated articles (such as the entry on political correctness). It's a very warm and human book, not a cold and emotionless work like a conventional dictionary. The now-familiar original dedication from the 1926 first edition - where H.W.Fowler tells of how he planned the book with his brother, who died of TB before the book could be written - has lost none of its power, and we can still wonder how the book would have been different had he lived. There's all the classics too, such as advice and examples on the good old "who vs whom" debate. I found it was possible to just open the book at random and find interesting entries, so this new edition, like previous editions, isn't just a reference book, it can be dipped into for entertainment and education where required. Anyone who cares about their writing as I do, either professionally or as a hobby, will be very well served by this book and should buy a copy immediately.

## Technical Specifications

| Specification | Value |
|---------------|-------|
| ASIN  | 0199661359 |
| Best Sellers Rank | 260,012 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books ) 513 in Grammar, Structure & Syntax 529 in Vocabulary Reference 1,962 in Encyclopaedias (Books) |
| Customer reviews | 4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars (232) |
| Dimensions  | 21.84 x 5.08 x 14.48 cm |
| Edition  | 4th |
| ISBN-10  | 9780199661350 |
| ISBN-13  | 978-0199661350 |
| Item weight  | 1.05 kg |
| Language  | English |
| Print length  | 928 pages |
| Publication date  | 26 Mar. 2015 |
| Publisher  | OUP Oxford |

## Images

![Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/713Zkco-pcL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ A useful - and also very enjoyable - reference book
*by P***R on 27 February 2018*

This newest version of “Fowler”, by Jeremy Butterfield, is a great book. It’s really enjoyable to dip into, as well as being a useful reference work. You can intend to just look one thing up, and end up spending half an hour browsing through various entries. In his introduction, Butterfield admits that in this book he is being both descriptive and prescriptive. That is, he is both describing how English IS used today, and also making comments on how he thinks it SHOULD be used. Today the experts generally talk about “standard” English rather than “correct” English. But sometimes Butterfield rightly points out that certain things are clearly wrong. For example, we should definitely write “It’s raining”, and not “Its raining”. However, it is often the case that what is classed as “standard” changes over time, leading to a situation where there might be two ways of writing something, with opinion divided over which is “correct”. So, for example, “media” is the plural of medium, and it would therefore strictly speaking be correct to say “The mass media are...” rather than “The mass media is...” But Butterfield shows that it is becoming increasingly acceptable to say and write the latter, with “media” being used as a collective noun with singular agreement. Another example of change is the fact that far more people now write “A historical...” than “An historical...” The former has become “standard”. The up-to-date nature of the book is also shown by the fact that we have discussions on the use of “website” versus “web site”, and “online” versus “on line” versus “on-line”. I also like the way that the author shoots down myths such as these three: (1) That you should never end a sentence with a preposition. (2) That you should never start a sentence with “And”. (3) That you should never split an infinitive. I really like this book, but that doesn’t mean I always agree with Butterfield. For example, he recommends “coordinate” and “cooperate” rather than “co-ordinate” and “co-operate”. But given that he acknowledges that we should write “co-opt” and “co-op”, it seems more logical to me to stick to “co-ordinate” and “co-operate”. But disagreements like this make the whole subject more interesting. Phil Webster.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ A great new edition: modern and up to date, yet still our trusty classic
*by I***T on 1 April 2015*

This is the first new edition in 19 years, and it's excellent. Bigger than ever, and full of entries for some very modern up-to-date words, some common (podcast) and others not so common (wilfing, anyone?) The new editor appears to have done an exhaustive (and exhausting) overhaul of the book, while keeping its spirit alive. The introduction, where the editor explains how the modern Oxford English Corpus - a database of texts - has helped him to compile the book, is also very interesting. The advice ranges from the practical and mundane to the more opinionated articles (such as the entry on political correctness). It's a very warm and human book, not a cold and emotionless work like a conventional dictionary. The now-familiar original dedication from the 1926 first edition - where H.W.Fowler tells of how he planned the book with his brother, who died of TB before the book could be written - has lost none of its power, and we can still wonder how the book would have been different had he lived. There's all the classics too, such as advice and examples on the good old "who vs whom" debate. I found it was possible to just open the book at random and find interesting entries, so this new edition, like previous editions, isn't just a reference book, it can be dipped into for entertainment and education where required. Anyone who cares about their writing as I do, either professionally or as a hobby, will be very well served by this book and should buy a copy immediately.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Book or kindle?
*by T***E on 22 January 2023*

I have just bought the kindle version, but within ames-ace of doing that I am certain I'll be buying the hard copy as well. Fowler's Usage, here updated in a 4th edtn published 2015, is one to browse and riffle through, which kindle doesn't really lend itself to. On the other hand, kindle does accommodate highlighting - anathema to any book lover - and searching which, in a book organised alphabetically, is invaluable. I have already delighted in Fowler/Butterworth's laying bare the use of the apostrophe: I'm so glad that my use of it, as in eg 1960's, is not incorrect! And I am now about to digest the guidance on the use of the colon vs semi-colon... My one lament so far? No discussion that I have yet found of the distinction between envy and jealousy. Nay matter, I've already made my mind up on that one.

## Frequently Bought Together

- Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage
- Garner's Modern English Usage
- Oxford American Writer's Thesaurus

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.ro/products/52434204-fowlers-dictionary-of-modern-english-usage](https://www.desertcart.ro/products/52434204-fowlers-dictionary-of-modern-english-usage)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Romania*
*Store origin: RO*
*Last updated: 2026-02-16*