ArcticPro 27 inch 300Hz 240Hz Gaming Monitor, FHD 1080p, 1ms, PC Monitor Gaming, IPS, Adaptive sync, PC Computer Monitor, sRGB 125%, Ultra Slim, DP x2, HDMI x2, VESA Support, with DP cable up to 300Hz

El mejor monitor 100% recomendado

Such a great product! No issues with any setup. It literally took no time at all

Honestly this monitor has really surprised me. Typically, my expectations are very low for most of these off brand monitors because in my experience they never perform anywhere near as well as the "name brand" counterparts. I received this monitor in March of 25 and I'm only now writing a review (Nov 25) because one of the things that tends to happen with these cheaper monitors is they work ok for a few months but then they start to show their secrets and issues later. This one has not. In fact it has continually impressed me for the price and I've been using it as my primary monitor since I got it. It replaced in theory a considerably nicer BenQ 32" 1440 P monitor and it's just been collecting dust on the shelf since. For the price this is a fantastic value. It is crisp, the colors are decent, and my main take away is there is absolutely no ghosting which is critical for high paced pfs shooters. I have used this for hundreds of hours primarily on my gaming PC but also on a xbox series x and it has been fantastic. My gaming PC at 1080p can max out BO6 multiplayer at this monitors native refresh rate (280hz/fps) and it looks brilliant and butter smooth. Every monitor I have ever purchased eventually gets a few dead pixels. Even monitors I've paid well over $1000 dollars for. Yeah I'm talking about you LG Ultragear OLED. But I haven't found the first dead pixel on this thing and I can't hardly believe it. A few things of note: -The add claims this is a 300Hz monitor. Technically that is not true. To get 300 you have to use some built in overclocking features to achieve that and typically that leads to artifacts on screen. It's native resolution is 280Hz which is still crazy fast and way more than most would ever need to, or be able to push. -This is an AMD FreeSync Monitor. NVIDIA does not recognize this monitor as GSYNC compatible however it does work. NVIDIA has 3 Classifications of monitors which are: GSYNC Certified, GSYNC Compatible, and Non Compatible. In the NVIDIA control panel this monitor shows up as non compatible. However, you can force it to run GSYNC and it works. It will however have a lot of flickering & strobing while in menus and while using programs like photoshop, Divinci Resolve, etc. However, when in game, it's buttery smooth and in my opinion that's a price worth paying for the smoothness of GSYNC in games. If you're familiar with using Freesync monitors with NVIDIA cards you'll already be familiar with this. I typically just disable GSYNC when I'm not gaming and the flickering in the game menus doesn't really bother me. Just to be clear, It DOES NOT flicker or cause problems while in game. -Lastly, 1080p stretched on a 27" monitor can look a bit pixelated in some scenarios. That's not specific to this monitor though. It's the case with any 1920x1080 27" monitor. Text on web pages can look a bit jarring if you're not used to it but you do get used to it pretty quickly. Again it's weighing the cost vs benefit here. In games it still looks plenty good especially if you use NVIDIA DLSS. A 1440p resolution will look sharper, but will net significantly less fps so that's something you'll need to consider for yourself. For me personally, I want maximum fps performance for competitive gaming so 1080p is perfect for me. All in all this monitor is surprisingly good and a great value. Is it perfect? No, but I've been extremely happy with it.

As far as monitors go, this one is alright. It's primary function, that is displaying your pc graphics, is about as good as any monitor I've ever had, though I call that about average. I'm not a fan of this 'blue light filter' phase we're going through. We have a word for things that filter blue light, and that word is 'orange'. You can not block blue light and have color fidelity. If the light it blocks is off the end of the visible spectrum, then that's ultraviolet, not blue. This monitor does have a function to reduce the blue output, and turn your image orange, but any monitor with a RGB color adjustment (which is just about all of them, I think) lets you dial down the blue as much or as little as you want so I'm not impressed. "Full HD" is starting to get on in years, and 4K is all the rage, but I find full HD (or 1080p, as I prefer to call it) is adequate. Things can get pretty small on a 4K screen and scaling, if available at all, doesn't always make things look right to me. I like to use a refresh rate of 240 Hz. This is a number that neatly divides by 30 (The NTSC frame rate of TV in the US) and 24 (The PAL standard that had been in use in Europe), and the monitor handles that. I don't find that refresh rate bothers me much, even when it's low, ever since we ditched the CRT and their strobing light and the eye strain that came with it. Going from 144 Hz to 300, my old eyeballs can't tell the difference. It does not come with any built in USB hub like my old monitor. If has a headphone hook on the left hand side that is plastic. I wouldn't trust it to take a knock, but it would probably hold your headphones. You can extend it or leave it hidden in the monitor body. The main detraction for this monitor, to me, is that it is powered with a wall wart adapter instead of the industry standard power cord. This screen is not light or thin enough that I think the electronics could not have been built into the screen and a standard cord used. I don't think it would be too hard to find a replacement 12 volt, 4 amp, tip positive barrel plug power adapter, but not everyone knows how to read that information, what it means, or where to find those if a dog chews up their cable one day. I wouldn't say the stand was anything to write home about, either, but I use the VESA mount and a monitor arm to hold this one so I can't speak to how well it works or how stable it is. The weight of this screen is about equal to the one it's replaced. It's not that heavy and relatively easy to handle for a screen of this size so maybe the stand performs as well as it has to and I'm giving it side eye for no reason.