Size Chart: ❤Recommended Age:3 MonthsLabel Size:60Bust:69cm/27.2"Sleeve:31cm/12.2"Length:56cm/22.1"Height:60-65cm ❤Recommended Age:6 MonthsLabel Size:65Bust:71cm/28"Sleeve:32cm/12.6"Length:58cm/22.8"Height:65-70cm ❤Recommended Age:9 MonthsLabel Size:70Bust:74cm/29.2"Sleeve:34cm/13.4"Length:61cm/24"Height:70-75cm ❤Recommended Age:12 MonthsLabel Size:75Bust:77cm/30.4"Sleeve:37cm/14.6"Length:64cm/25.2"Height:75-80cm ❤Recommended Age:18 MonthsLabel Size:80Bust:80cm/31.5"Sleeve:39cm/15.4"Length:67cm/26.4"Height:80-90cm ❤Recommended Age:24 MonthsLabel Size:90Bust:83cm/32.7"Sleeve:41cm/16.2"Length:70cm/27.6"Height:90-100cm
A**.
Awful!!! Picture misguided me!!!
Nothing like the pictures shown. In the pictures they look full so pretty puffy. In person nothing like that super super thin very very cheap material and looking. 🤦♀️🤦♀️
E**D
Cheaply made..
It was not worth the wait . its pretty thin. Could they spare the filling ? The best part is the detachable hood that doesnt tie shot or snap . and the belt buy anither snowsuit...
E**A
DECEIVING
DEF NOT WHAT PIC LOOKS LIKE, FEELS LIKE PLASTIC JACKET WITH A GLUE FUR HOOD,
Y**B
Cute but not for MN Winters.
The photo gives impression that jacket is a thick coat for baby. It's not. You will still have to bundle baby up under the coat a lot. I bought this jacket thinking I wouldn't have to do this.
F**Y
I FEEL DUPED!!!
Cheap material; thin and lightweight; not for cold winters, fur on hood looks full and fluffy in the pic however it was thin matted and cheap looking. Material gathered in the crotch area and rose up my grandson's leg to the point where it looked as though he was wearing shorts. He is preemie yet size 24 months was still too small.
T**A
horrible quality
looks cute but it doesnot keep baby warm. it is horrible quality, i didnt even put it on the baby because it was such bad quality, wasnt going to risk my baby having hypothermia
B**L
quality
not as warm as it looks, very light, poor quality
G**E
Ggioo
Wery bad quality dont buy
Trustpilot
2 months ago
2 days ago
