The Cambridge Companion to Kants Critique of Pure Reason

Now, what exactly do you want to do with this book? Learn to understand Kant?Then this is not for you. This book is not interesting to the common man, or even most people with a background in philosophy. This seems to me like a bunch of articles aimed at people who are already more than knowledgeable on Kant (aside from few exceptions).It doesn't help that the people working on this seem to replicate the way Kant himself wrote, and by that I mean that the prose is very obscure and difficult to understand. Nothing is clearly explain, and many articles rely way too much on extended quotes (I can read Kant's book myself, actually explain Kant instead of quoting him).This book will only appeal to specialist, it is not a "companion" in any shape or form. Moreover, I would say that even the specialist could find better than this utter rubbish to further their knowledge on Kant.

Lo uso en mis clases

received as promised.

Ideas themselves are so tough, I would be unpopular if anything you never thought about showed up in 2017, when even Russia might be a bad topic for the antinomies political questions dodge and weave in spans of attention we desire to lack. The ideal of pure reason might discover stages of stump, stomp, snort, and stink in time and space reduced to the electronic news cycle. Thug up.

Guyer is amazing and he's saying a lot that he's not writing.