Vanity FairWomen's Underwear Lollipop Traditional Cotton Briefs

I have been looking for underwear without elastic around the legs. And looking. And looking. Finally found these Lollipop. What a difference. Those little bands of elastic most manufacturers use are the worst. They cause itching, chafing and misery. The only reasons I’ve not given Lollipops 5 stars is the cotton fabric could be softer, and the elastic around the waist could also be softer, maybe a little wider, covered by the fabric. I’d be willing to pay a couple bucks more for that. And maybe make them in a few more fun colors. But these are petty suggestions compared to the comfort.

I purchased these because I am trying to avoid latex. They are a very nice quality and they wash well. Comfortable but one star off because the leg openings start off fitting perfectly when you put them on but expand. Within a couple of hours you're wearing baggy drawers!

I ordered size 10, larger than I use ordinarily, but I wanted these to wear at night in bed. They were too tight for comfort. They are well-made and soft to the touch, and would be excellent if the size were right.

I always purchased this brand underwear until they stopped making sizes over 12. I need size 13. I had to change to a different brand and that's why they only get 3 stars.

Excellent

The quality of this brief was fine but I have been buying sz. 6 briefs my whole life and not run into one brand that didn’t fit me right until now. I am 5’2” and weigh 120 lbs. It appears this brief would fit well on someone with a much longer torso than me. It was way too long ( even after a couple of washings) and it fit snug hip to hip direction. The leg holes were looser than I would prefer although I do have fairly thin upper thighs. If I filled the leg holes out better they would have been more comfortable. Instead the brief liked to ride up as a result. Bottom line: would be great for tall slender gals with average+ thighs but would avoid if you are on the short side.

I didn’t return them as I washed them but know there’s not a lot of stretch in the leg openings. Sears use to carry the best underwear that were identical to these

very comfortable but true granny panties. but im a granny so all good.

First time buying this new style; bought sizes 5, 6, 7 to get right fit. The 7 is barely larger than the 6, so am washing/drying the size 7's and will try on again - if no shrinkage will buy more that size. They seem comfy quick try on - was looking for something no elastic poking into top of leg... I understand completely why we cant try on underwear/return so have been buying same brand similar sizes for many years, but wanted a change and these "lollipops" looked soft on legs - will find out .. too bad sizes not in inches but hard to have perfect fit for all of our body shapes! That's why when I find a brand/style that fits and I like and washes and dries well, keep buying for years.... although sizes increase with my age! Photo of 6 and 7 just out of package BTW. *added. i washed a lot in hot water and should hot have so now will be looking for size 8, its the legs, if you dont have narrow tops of legs can get a bit tighter after many washes. Really like them tho

I never expected them to fit so well. They cover extremely well and I ordered 1 size up because I throw all my underwear in the washer and dryer and they shrunk a little bit and now fit perfectly. I would recommend these briefs to anyone who wants their bottom covered.

Fits as per size. Very comfy.

They squeeze too much around the thigh ! I much prefer the other style, but they are no longer available in the Candleglow colour !!Such a shame !

The legs were way too small. I do not ha e big legs. This was a disappointment.