Los Angeles Times Sunday Crossword Omnibus, Volume 7 (The Los Angeles Times)
J**N
Always fun and frustrating!
Yep!
A**R
Too many obscure clues.
I won’t buy anymore of these puzzle books. Too difficult with the many ridiculous clues.
T**A
Interesting, not terribly challenging puzzles
Good quality paper ( ink does not bleed through), easy to read clues, puzzles fun to do, make you think but not have to look things up.
R**S
Los Angeles Times crossword omnibus
I am a fiend for crossword puzzles and only order the Sunday puzzles. My favorite is the Los Angeles Times because they have a puzzle meter that lets you know the difficulty and styles of puzzles before you buy. I probably spend two hours daily working the puzzles in ink of course and go through a book pretty fast so I stock up and especially like the OMNIBUS because of the large selection. Ours of fun!
J**.
Inexpensive Brain Supplement!
Love it! I agree a spiral format would be easier to work with but I just make a copy of the page and then attach it to a clipboard. This will keep the book in great condition which I could then later donate to the Senior Center, hospital or give to a friend. Used to wait every week for the Sunday newspaper to arrive at the library. Now I have 200 puzzles all at once!
G**R
Mediocre collection of older puzzles— Not spiral bound.
Mediocre collection of older puzzles— Not spiral bound.
C**.
It is not easy but not as hard as the New York Times puzzle.
I like this because it is my degree of difficult, meaning not for the average puzzle worker but slightly more difficult. I work on these several at a time, work as far as I can go on one, then go on to another. When I complete the book I go back and finish the ones left unfinished. Enjoyable for me.
L**F
Very challenging but a bit dated
While I like the puzzles for the diversity and difficulty, the references are several years old so that makes for an additional challenge to try to remember what was going on at that time.
M**D
Three Stars
I wish it was cheaper
Trustpilot
1 day ago
2 months ago