Persians (Greek Tragedy in New Translations)

This was the first of the ancient Greek plays reviewed by Professor Meineck in his "Modern Scholar" lecture. It has the unique distinction of being the earliest surviving play we have from anywhere in the world. Aeschylus wrote this play about a real historical event: the Battle of Salamis, which he was a veteran of and during which the Persian army was soundly defeated. The play seems to me to have 3 themes which played off of each other: the folly of exceeding mortal limits, which the Persians did in attempting "to throw slavery's yoke firm on the Greeks"; the courage and resoluteness of the "Sons of Greece" to "fight for all [they] have!"; the tragedy of war as far as loss of human life, which in this battle meant that "Persia's flower is gone, cut down".Although I am far from being anything near a classicist, I did find much to enjoy about this particular play. It could be that it was based on a real historical event and I enjoy history a lot, although how it was told in the play is nothing like what would be acceptable as "real history" by modern scholars. Parts of it were boring and dragged on, this is a very different and long-dead culture one must remember so some of the context is lost to me. This particular translation certainly helped as some of the prose seemed to be charged with emotion that brought the events to life in my mind. Here's an example, with a messenger sorrowfully telling the news of the near-total loss of the Persian invasion fleet:"Then the Greek ships, seizing their chance,swept in circling and struck and overturnedour hulls,and saltwater vanished before our eyes -shipwrecks filled it, and drifting corpses.Shores and reefs filled up with our deadand every able ship under Persia's commandbroke order,scrambling to escape.We might have been tuna or netted fish,for they kept on, spearing and gutting uswith splintered oars and bits of wreckage,while moaning and screams drowned outthe sea noise tillNight's black face closed it all in."(Lines 682-697)I'm not usually one who enjoys poetry much, but the raw emotion conveyed in these words was palpable. It rather surprised me when I read this to have such a reaction. I felt like I could actually see the wrecked hulks of the Persian ships with the bodies of their dead floating in the sea, at least as if I was watching a movie about the battle instead of just reading a play. Look, I am by no means an expert at this but this is a play that even a novice such as myself was able to find meaning to. Yes, some of it bored me to no end and I have no desire to see the play performed live (the chorus still looks hokey even in this translation), but there is still something there to enjoy and take from this play. I know nothing about all the different translations of this play, but I can tell you that this particular one was excellent and however "authentic" it may or may not be it certainly made this ancient play accessible to an amateur like me. I cannot say the same about any other translation, so if you are looking to read this give this one a try. I highly recommend it.

This modern translation does the original great service. It strives to be faithful to the Greek, and the notes explain in detail the choices when it varies greatly, yet it pulses with the poet's beat throughout.

Written by a long-dead dude and a vet of the Persian War. Great for understanding the Greek's ideas about the Persians after they beat them in years prior.

Terrible formatting in the Kindle with wildly irregular font sizes on the same page. Shameful treatment of a good text. Preview before you purchase. Sloppy, disappointing and unprofessional editing.

I do not recommend the digital edition. The formatting makes it virtually unreadable on a Kindle. It switches font sizes in an extreme manner, sometimes four or five times on a page. In order to read the smallest words it is necessary to set the font to the highest available size, and even then it displays at maybe 5 points: almost indecipherable. The largest size, often on the same page, displays only four or five words to the line. Publishers of ebooks should pay more attention to the reader's experience. I returned this ebook.

First drama recorded by man

Was great piece of literary art.

"The Persians" is a minor work in the extant plays of Aeschylus, but has considerable historical if not dramatic significance. The play is the second and only remaining tragedy from a lost tetralogy that is based on the historical events of the Persians Wars. The play was performed in 472 B.C., eight years after the defeat of the invaders at the Battle of Salamis. The speech by the Messenger is assumed to be a fairly accurate description of the battle, but the focus of the play is on the downfall of the Persian Empire because of the folly of Xerxes. After the ghost of Darius, father of Xerxes and the leader of the first Persian invasion that was defeated at the Battle of Marathon laments the ruin of the great empire he had ruled, Xerxes offers similar histrionics concerning the destruction of his fleet.The play is interesting because Aeschylus presents Xerxes, a foreign invader, as exhibiting the same sort of hubris that afflicts the greatest of mythological heroes in these Greek tragedies. Laud and honor is given the Athenians for defeating the Persians in battle, but Aeschylus surprisingly provides a look at the Persian king's culpability in the downfall of his empire. There is a reference in the play to the tradition that Xerxes was descended from Perseus (for whom the Persian race was therefore named), but even so it seems quite odd to turn him into a traditional Greek tragic hero. Aeschylus had fought the Persians at the Battles of Marathon and Salamis, which certainly lends authenticity to his description of events.Aeschylus won the festival of Dionysus in 472 B.C. with the tetralogy of "Phineus," "The Persians," "Glaucus of Potniae," and the satyr play "Prometheus the Fire-Kindler." Phineas was the king who became the victim of the Harpies, while this particular Glaucus was the son of Sisyphus and the father of Bellerophon who was torn to pieces by his own mares. Consequently, this particular tetralogy clearly has the theme of kings brought down by their own folly. But even within that context, the fact that Aeschylus would write of a historical rather than legendary figure, not to mention a Persian rather than a Greek, remains more than a minor historical curiosity.