Forbidden Psychology 101: The Cool Stuff They Didn't Teach You About In School

This book was jotted down and self-published. Taylor does not brag about qualifications...because he/she has none. I have a BA in psychology and 39 graduate hours in psychology. I did read this book and found it be extremely superficial. Just someone with too much time on his/her hands trying to make an extra buck.If you want to study this type of material get an actual text book. Or at least one by someone who has the credentials. See my review on Dark Psychology 202 by m pace. This essentially the same review. Don't waste your time. Check out the publishing info: Make Profits Easy LLCSomeone with some will power (or is desperate) and a long weekend could put this together.

Written in the style of a high school thesis, this book exists merely to fill a bookshelf. The author clearly has no expertise in the science of psychology. The overwhelming majority of the book’s content is fluffy, opinionated, and circular—the same thoughts or supporting details are presented several different ways in each sentence but say nothing new in each. This is a disappointing purchase.

It is seldom I do not complete a book. THis one I could not keep going after reading about half of the text. There is little here to recommend and even less of interest. I recommend you skip this one.

This book seems to be wrote with the intention to waste the reader's time. It teaches nothing to the reader. It would be a complete loss of money if I wasn't for the lesson to never shop for books on the internet and drive to book stores instead.It's a dump of ramblings about psychology.

As described. Really didn't have any info that I didn't know already. Was hoping it would offer more.

Awful, do not buy!

never did get to read a single word due download issues with drm. I returned it. what's the point having abook listed for purchase but cannot read???

Zero Stars if OptionMinor to Major Inaccuracies. I could not read further past the third chapter because of sloppy writing. The author claimed that Little Baby Albert was Rosalie Rayner's son and possibly John B. Watson was Albert's father! This is so far from the truth it is funny. The Stanford Prison Study lasted at least 6 days in length whereas the author says 5. Phillip Z did not stop the study, his female assistant forced the shutdown. David Reminer's original name was Bruce, I am betting the author failed to realize this note. Some interesting studies interwoven with inadequately investigated material.