XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS XXX Edition 1386MHz OC+, 8GB GDDR5, VR Ready, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, AMD Graphics Card (RX-580P8DFD6)

Great graphics card. Felt good to finally go team AMD and retire my Intel/Nvidia Build. For reference, back in 2015, AMD seemed like it was going to fade away into obscurity. It had nothing to compete with before Zen, or against the 1070, 1080 series. Kind of hurt supporting the winning teams again, instead of the underdog. It also sucks we live in a timeline where scalpers, AI, and chip shortages drive prices double to triple MSRP. (Especially Ram in 2026.) All things considered, it is a great card on 2K high Settings. 4K might be asking a bit much, as you might start to go below 60fps on certain games. For a Midrange Card, it performs as it should and has gone into a very reasonable price range. Unlike Nvidia, where you get your extra 25-30% performance increase at 3-5 times the cost.

I bought it during Christmas just for myself as a gift because I've been meaning to upgrade for a while now from a 3060 to just something new and I thought what the heck and after a few reviews on the 7900xt vs the xtx I wanted a change of pace from Nvidia and went with the 7900xt just because it was cheaper by about 250 which goes along way. Finally received it and no complaints I can't really sam much since I've only had it for about a month now but for being on of Radeons Heavy Hitters it's a solid card nothing bad to say despite what people might think. The card stays relatively quiet even under heavy load the fans blow but nothing that's irritating. The value or price to performance is pretty solid being able to throw blows with the 4080 as the Nvidia equivalent and since those are pretty much all gone or scalp prices 750 is a good compromise and again within its own brand you only loose about 1/6th of the proofreader compared to the 7900xtx for the price. The card itself is pretty sturdy I haven't had any issues with it although others have pointed out bent and or broken pcbs but my card didn't have either and if It does and I just haven't payed it too much attention or noticed it doesn't affect performance. Only thing is that it's hefty really hearty that it most definitely will sag and you are gonna need something to hold it up I'm not sure on the black version but on the white they give u a little peg to hold it up that's adjustable Since it's a 4080 equivalent the card looks great itself and in in games I haven't had any issues playing any titles despite again what others might say about driver issues in newer games but that's not to say I haven't had a hiccup here or there but nothing that outright stops me from playing the games Overall I think it's a good middle ground the card should be enough fir games now and future releases to hold you down with the 24gb of ram for newer ganes and those to come for 750 its solid. I'm sure you could also find it cheaper I just went with the xfx because they had it in white so it could match my system build

The XFX RX 9060 XT delivers great performance in 1080p and 1440p, runs quiet, and stays cool even during long gaming sessions. Easy to install and solid build quality. Highly recommended if you want strong performance without spending too much.

I've only had this card for a couple of days, but so far so good. Install was incredibly easy. It uses only one non high power 12 volt power connector sooo no having to worry about the connector melting like on NVIDIA cards. I'm running this in a rig with a B450 aurous Elite, Ryzen 7 5800x, 32GB of Corsair DDR4 5600mghz RAM, and all games are installed on m.2 SATA or 2.5 inch SATA SSD's. For reference I play all of my games at 1080p so moving forward my comments on this card are going to based around gaming at that resolution. I'm stepping up from an RTX 2070 Non Super 8GB to this RX 9060XT 16GB. Yep I'm full team red this go around. The performance increase over the 2070 is significant as one should expect. It also stays very cool at around 65c under load. I gained on average around a 50% performance uplift over the 2070. The lowest FPS I ever got so far in one of the games I play is in GTAV but maxed out to the nth degree was 45 fps on up to 60 fps. If you want to count Cyber Punk 2077 I played it maxed out at ULTRA everything with path tracing at it's highest and I was still getting around 30fps. Even when I switched back to regular Ray Tracing at ULTRA everything I was still getting around 50-65 fps on average which is actually super incredible for a card not built on NVIDIA's Path tracing and Ray Tracing technologies. I had not tried Cyber Punk 2077 with out ray tracing as I am super used to gaming at 30-40 FPS so running it at 50-65 FPS WITH Ray Tracing was insane to me. On my 2070 I couldn't even get it to run above 40FPS without ray tracing on high settings. If I turn off Ray Tracing in Cyber Punk 2077 and still keep all other settings at max I'm averaging between 60-70 FPS. I have to say that with AMD's 9000 series of cards, they are actually kicking keister with ray tracing. I also played CONTROL at max settings and fully Ray Traced and was averaging 45-55 fps. Without Ray Tracing I was averaging 60-70 fps. So if you want to dabble in playable Ray Tracing at 1080p This card can do it pretty well. The only reason NVIDIA is losing at their own technology war is because NVIDIA still insists on shipping product with only 8GB of VRAM at above premium prices. The whole reason this card is so good is because it has 16gb of VRAM. I would completely ignore the 8gb version. If you're going to buy the 8gb version of this card you might as well get a 4060 8gb or a 5060 8gb. 16gb Gives you plenty of head room for things like enhanced textures, volumetric fog, anti aliasing, frame generation, up-scaling and more. NVIDIA is bottle necking their own cards. You could buy the Ti 16GB versions of NVIDIA cards and the problem virtually disappears but you'll also pay at least $200-$400 more over MSRP for that card too which at that point just get a 9070XT unless you absolutely HAVE to have a 5090 or have some very specific use case for an NVIDIA card. Again my words are surrounding 1080p gaming. Another game I played on this card that is super demanding is Monster Hunter Wilds. On my 2070 it was nearly unplayable even by my very low standards. You gotta understand I started my pc gaming journey on a Pentium processor with integrated graphics getting 20 to maybe 30 fps in games. My standards for playable are very LOW. On MH Wilds I was getting around 35 FPS on average with lows dipping to the teens regularly causing loads of micro freezes that interrupt gameplay. This is mostly do to Crapcom completely ignoring optimization of the game on PC and the game needing every bit and byte of available system ram and VRAM it can guzzle. I still put a frustrated 75 hours into that game. On the 9060XT 16gb It's nooo problem. I can play it at ultra settings and still get 45-65 FPS. You'll notice I put a wide FPS range there. That is because of what I stated earlier about the game with Crapcom not optimizing it. The game is so un-optimized it doesn't matter which GPU you use, you're going to have WILD frame rate swings of about +/-20 FPS. It's crazy. At Least with this GPU you can stay at actually playable frame rates MOST of the time. This is not the fault of the card. All of my games look and play incredible. Just real quick, The Witcher 3 looks and plays phenomenally. best looking game of the bunch...at least until I try out red dead 3. Star Citizen runs flawlessly minus the regular bugs and glitches since it's...you know.. STILL in alpha. I regularly get around 50-75 FPS depending on if you are at a major planet side city or out in the middle of no man's land Daymar. higher population will drop your frame rate like usual but that's again, and issue the developers of the game need to get sorted out. The drivers are also actually pretty decent. It was a lot easier to install over NVDIA drivers since you aren't forced to create an account and log into their app to install said drivers. AMD's Adrenaline has more utilities to control and monitor your GPU and PC over NVDIA's "APP", though NVDIA has really good tools for recording and broadcasting your game play. You could also just use OBS instead. One downside to Adrenaline is that it does seem to be noticeably slower to navigate through than the NVDIA "APP". I'm talking about just general browsing around the app and changing settings. It gets even worse during gameplay when you press "ALT+R" to bring up the Adrenaline overlay. It takes a a solid 10-30 seconds to bring up the overlay depending on what game you are playing. Once it's up navigating the overlay does seem to be quite slow and not very responsive. That said you do have WAY more options for things to change around than you do in the NVDIA "APP". Adrenaline does also have active information overlays like frame counters, CPU load meters, Memory Usage meters etc. The adrenaline software also lets you customize theses information overlays with a LOT more options than NVDIA's "APP" You can change the color of the label of the information type as well as the information it self so the information can standout from the label for easier reading. For example I have my labels set to the color purple while the information it self is green. You can also change what information shows , where it shows, if it shows in several rows or a single row, and how big that information shows. So If I want to show only a small FPS counter in the upper left corner of my game with the info label colored white and the information labeled red I can totally do that. Conversely I can show FPS, CPU load, and System Memory Usage sized large in the lower left corner of my games but colored all yellow if I want too. There are also a lot more option of what information can be displayed than I'm typing here but know that it is a LOT more detailed than what the NVDIA overlay Offers. I actually very much prefer the Adrenaline software over NVDIA's offering simply for the available functionality and Information display on offer. It could definitely be optimized to improve UI navigation responsiveness though. So far there is only one game I have had trouble running on this card and that is Elite Dangerous. Not sure if it's a driver issue, game settings issue, or what. I can load into the main menu but as soon as I try to load into the actual game it crashes to desktop. Dunno why yet but I highly doubt I won't be able to figure out what the issue is. Once I do I'll update this review. If you are playing any of the battle royal , hero shooters, or Counter strike/ CS styled games you are going to have zero problems with frame rate on this card. You will have hundreds of fps at 1080p. Overall this is a fantastic card that will play any game you throw at it at max settings at 1080p. This is close to being the ultimate 1080p Card. Especially if you can get it at or near MSRP and I'd get to buying one quick if you want one because thanks to the supreme orange leader we now have 100% tariffs coming for U.S. buyers as of 10-20-2025. GET EM WHILE THEY'RE REASONABLY PRICED. Speaking on 1440p Gaming briefly, Based off of testing that I've seen and my own experiences gaming at 1080p I see no reason this card wouldn't also be a GOOD 1440p card. I wouldn't expect to be able to do Ray Tracing almost at all at 1440p with this card and still have playable frame rates BUT I would expect it to play games with no Ray tracing on high to max settings in almost all games. Ray Tracing is overrated any how. It doesn't look THAT different during gameplay. I mean if you are screen shot junkie you'll probably care about it. but during gameplay Ray tracing isn't worth the amount of hardware resources and cost needed to run it well. If you want to game at 4k you can do it on this card but you won't get above 40-50 fps in most games with maxed out settings. You can absolutely forget Ray Tracing at 4k. It won't do it well. If you want all bells and whistles to be playable at 4k and future proofed you're going to have to pony up the cheddar for a 5090 16gb which is incredibly terrible price to value ratio. You gotta ask your self if gaming at 4k is REALLY worth spending that much money on a rig. If you're a 1080p gamer upgrading from an older card this one kicks butt. If you are upgrading from a last gen card in the same price category there might not be THAT much performance gain to warrant spending this much cash on a new card unless you need the 16gb of vram which honestly every one does. If this is your scenario the only significant positives with this card is access to FSR 4 and the 16gb of VRAM and a slight improvement on FPS. Deff better than previous gen cards but is it worth it for those things and the money you'll spend? If you are building a completely new rig I would still recommend this card over the 5060 8gb in a similar price range simply because this card has double the VRAM. Again you could get the 5060TI with 16gb of VRAM to really beat out the performance of 9060XT but the 5060 Ti sitting at around $700. At that price just buy a 9070 XT. The 9060 XT is a solid card full stop and you'd have to be an elitist power user to be displeased with it's performance.

Excellent quality. Performs well for my games, and looks wonderful in my build.

Si sabes lo que estás comprando con toda la controversia de los deficientes 8 Gb de VRam y lo emparejas con un procesador de para jugar en 1080p no te decepciona en potencia bruta Mucho mejor que una 6600 aún que si un poco más cara

Good value for money. Runs games at high fps in FHD. can play less intensive games at 4k in about medium settings

ASSOLUTAMENTE CONSIGLIATA, se la trovate a meno di 650 euro è un best buy, io l’ho presa a 709€ e ora cerco di parlarvene nel modo piu realistico possibile SCHEDA PER IL GAMING: Questa GPU ma in generale le GPU amd possono essere utilizzate anche per uso di programmi pesanti per uso lavorativo, quali blender mi possono venir in mente, ma se il vostro bisogno principale è una scheda video per uso lavorativo allora passate ad NVIDIA che offre più prestazioni riguardo questo lato, con ovviamente annesso un costo maggiore (a volte anche di 200/300€) rispetto alla controparte AMD. PRESTAZIONI NEL GAMING: Parlando di prestazioni a livello gaming, dove è il suo forte, cominciamo col dire che ho un Ryzen 7 9700x come cpu, quindi potreste non ricevere gli stessi risultati con altre cpu; ho giocato ad alcuni giochi come: Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, GTA V enhanced, Red Dead Redemption 2 e alcuni giochi un po vecchiotti come Assassin Creed Origins e Far Cry 4, IN 2k NATIVO ho avuto una media dagli 80 ai 120 fps in tutti i primi 3 giochi, negli ultimi 2 invece stavo sui 240 fissi (avendo un 240hz), quindi niente male. Tecnologie UPSCALING e Frame Generation. La RX 9070xt dispone del FSR4 ma piu o meno nessun gioco ne he dotato, pero per chi è piu “esperto” un po come me avrà provato a cercare qualcosa per importare FSR 4 come mod nei giochi, e l’ho trovato, si chiama OptiScaler, con questo software potere mettere FSR 4 su praticamente tutti i giochi, quale alzerà gli fps di tanto, se prima RDR 2 mi stava a 80-120fps, ora mi va a 130-160, ma non è finita qua, AMD offre nel suo software (dove si puo aggiornare il driver della scheda video) anche l’opzione del frame generation, per precisione AFMF 2.1, la cosa ottima è che si puo attivare questa opzioni in praticamente ogni gioco, facendo salire gli FPS da 120-160 come detto prima, a 240-300, senza creare artefatti, il quale è ottimo, per chi ha avuto esperienze con AFMF 1 probabilmente sapeva dei continui cali di frame e continui artefatti oltre alla pessima qualità video, con questa nuova versione posso dire che manco si nota, tutto questo solo attivando una opzione. QUALITÀ DI COSTRUZIONE: Oltre alle performance è doveroso parlare anche della costruzione fisica di questa Scheda, non è estremamente grande, come precedente scheda video avevo una rx 6800 e facevo fatica a farla entrare nel case addirittura, con questa entra che è una meraviglia, è praticamente tutta in metallo ma non pesa tantissimo, questo comporta anche che l’attacco della scheda video alla scheda madre non si curvi (come succede con altre schede video che con il loro peso pendendo verso il basso fanno piegare l’attacco) ma vi consiglio comunque un supporto per preservarne la durata il piu possibile. Conclusioni: Per il prezzo e le prestazioni che offre le do un 5 su 5, nulla da dire, ottima scheda video, per chiunque voglia un pc ottimo senza spendere 2 stipendi consiglio assolutamente questa scheda video, non ha rivali per qualità-prezzo

El diseño es robusto y de gran calidad. XFX no decepciona en sus diseños. El desempeño es acorde a lo que se paga.

Es muy bonita, el logo de xfx es rgb, visualmente muy buena. Actualizaré mi calificación después de un tiempo de uso. Requiere dos cables de 8pines para alimentar y al menos una fuente de 750w Es muy pesada pero incluye un brackets antisag