






🛡️ Style Meets Substance: Protect Your Nokia Like a Pro
The Zaoma Back Cover Case pack offers two premium thermoplastic polyurethane covers designed specifically for the Nokia 3210 4G 2024 DS (Model TA-1619). Featuring a sleek minimalist design, anti-slip grip sides, and a raised camera bump, these cases provide durable, flexible protection while maintaining perfect device compatibility. Ideal for professionals seeking both style and security in their mobile accessories.
| ASIN | B0D94DMTQ6 |
| Batteries Included | No |
| Batteries Required | No |
| Best Sellers Rank | #8,608 in Electronics ( See Top 100 in Electronics ) #1,130 in Mobile Basic Cases |
| Brand | ZAOMA |
| Compatible Devices | Nokia 3210 4G 2024 DS - Model No. : TA-1619 |
| Country of Origin | India |
| Customer Reviews | 4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars (245) |
| Date First Available | 1 April 2024 |
| Form Factor | Back Cover |
| Item Weight | 200 g |
| Item model number | NK32104G_GIZCC |
| Manufacturer | Zaoma |
| Material | Thermoplastic Polyurethane |
| Model | NK32104G_GIZCC |
| Model Name | NK32104G_GIZCC |
| Mounting Hardware | Back Cover |
| Net Quantity | 2 Count |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Package Dimensions | 20 x 10 x 2 cm; 200 g |
| Packer | Zaoma |
| Special Features | high raised camera bump |
A**R
Highly Impressed ❤️
Why did you pick this product vs others?: Bhailog me btau to ye case mujhe kaafi achha laga perfect fit aata hai phone me quality is superb I'll say definitely go for it 👍👍 Value for money: Definitely Durability: Superb Compatibility: Perfect fit
R**P
Good
Good product but little expensive
S**U
Fits well.
It fits my nokia phone as expected. I like it.
A**R
Bad finish but considerable
Material is good but USB cut is done by knife.
B**T
Black hat
Value for money
S**R
Quality not good, we are pay it not that type of cost.
Very bad quality not meet my expectations
S**M
Worth mobile case for Nokia 3210 4g
Very satisfied with this product. Light weight product and looks good.
S**E
Excellent product ♥️
Very good quality.1 star deducted because of the slight wrong cutting in the place of camera.
Trustpilot
4 days ago
3 days ago