Bike Cover Waterproof Outdoor Storage for 1/2/3 Bikes, Bicycle Cover Rain Sun UV Dust Wind Proof with Storage Bag for Mountain Road Bike/Ebike (210D Black+Green, XXL Size for 2 bikes)

Item is not waterproof (seams are not moulded on inside). My bikes are wet as a result of being outside in the rain. Also the cover is larger than I expected (sits on floor) and I thought fabric was stretchy for some reason but that’s not the case.

I bought this for my nephew’s birthday for his bike, it worked wonderful. He was thrilled with it and it protects his new bike from all the elements. It was a great choice. Great quality, good price.

I'm glad I decided to buy this fantastic bicycle cover out of several I looked at; it fits my Ebike perfectly! I especially like the bottom interlocking straps that keep the cover from blowing off in heavy winds! It also has a little hole in it so you can put your chain on your bike and lock it to a bike stand or something when it’s covered, so it doesn’t get stolen. That’s another feature. I like this particular bike cover. I wanted something large enough to cover the whole bike so it was totally protected. I got this wish since it fits my e-bike perfectly. It has a nice black cover, so it doesn’t show the dirt. Furthermore, it’s water-resistant, which is helpful if you take it for a ride and it rains. It comes with a little pouch that you could put your cover in while you’re riding your bike and hanging on the side. Then, if unexpected rain comes, you take it off, cover your bike up, and wait for the rain to stop. I like the fact that it’s a nice-looking cover, too. Serves its purpose well! I received it on the day Amazon promised, and I appreciate that.

Very lightweight but still seems sturdy. Easily covered 2 adult and 2 kids bikes .

My mobile operations, powered by the Trek Powerfly LT 9.9 Plus—a pedal-assist leviathan of a bike with its formidable 29-inch wheel and maximized frame—demand a protective apparatus equal to the task. This machine, which serves as my critical transportation link between field sites and the motorhome base, requires total defense against the relentless erosion of Nature's elements, primarily the ubiquitous siege of rain. The initial selection, while qualitatively sound, proved a lesson in the tyranny of dimensional parameters. The largest "1-bike" size was a garment of extreme compression, leading to a mechanical failure after a single night's rigorous examination by wind. The material succumbed, tearing just behind the handlebar—a three-inch wound that required the immediate application of Gorilla duct tape (an essential field repair technology) to both sides of the rupture. Subsequent usage led to a stress fracture in the stitching at the front wheel, confirming the initial diagnosis: extreme tension induced by a size mismatch. **The Social and Mechanical Failure When these mechanical compromises led to failure—a tear and a stitching split—I engaged the manufacturer’s support channel. The response was a study in modern corporate detachment: a directive to "work with Amazon to resolve the issue." This deflective maneuver is the antithesis of the scientific-industrial spirit, failing to acknowledge that the problem was not a simple fulfillment error, but a flaw in dimensional engineering versus material tensile strength. This exchange revealed a troubling fissure in the social contract between the purveyor of goods and the consumer, forcing the user to become the primary engineer and logistics expert. This experience necessitated a calculated escalation in scale, prompting the procurement of this XXXL (3-Bike) version—a deliberate over-engineering of the protective envelope. **The Fabric of Defense: GSM vs. Mechanical Strain The technical data provided for this cover is a study in material compromise. The cover is constructed from a 210D Oxford fabric and employs three core technologies: a hydrophobic coating, a PU waterproof coating, and an anti-UV coating. These features contribute to its impressive capacity to withstand a 3000mmH₂O water pressure—a testament to its layered, chemical barrier. However, the fabric's Gram-per-Square-Meter (GSM) value is only 80. This metric, representing the density and mass of the textile, reveals a critical physical trade-off. While a low GSM makes the cover commendably lightweight and easy to handle, it inherently results in lower tensile strength and tear resistance. When the material is subjected to the concentrated force of a very tight fit—such as the previous one-bike size stretched taut over a large 29-inch bike—or the dynamic, whipping force of high wind gusts, the mechanical stress exceeds the failure threshold of the lightweight fibers. The resulting tear and the stitching failure are therefore not defects in the waterproofing technology, but predictable mechanical failures caused by localized pressure overcoming the material's limited tear strength. The solution, as verified by my re-order, lies not in stronger material, but in dimensional liberty. **Redefining Scale and Command The XXXL Size for 3 bikes provides the necessary cavernous volume to comfortably house my single, large-framed electric conveyance, allowing the fabric to rest in a state of minimal tension. This new envelope, stretching to 87'' L x 43'' W x 47'' H, restores the integrity of the protective shield. Features such as the elastic band at the bottom and the front and rear wheel buckles are vital components in securing this expanded volume against the environment. Furthermore, the inclusion of the woven nylon lock hole is a commendable design decision; it prioritizes the long-term finish of the bike's frame over the unnecessary rigidity and potential abrasiveness of metal eyelets. The subtle green elements integrated into the black fabric are a nod to modern aesthetics, maintaining the functional purpose while avoiding a drab, purely utilitarian appearance. Despite the initial engineering conflict rooted in the smaller model's tight dimensional envelope, the core material quality and layered protection of the Topcrown system are undeniably sound. For those operating vehicles of significant size, the scientific solution is clear: bypass the size designations and procure an intentionally oversized capacity to ensure the cover acts as a relaxed, fully protective sheath rather than a stress-inducing membrane. The product is fit for service, provided the user calculates the necessary scale adjustment.